<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hostwars: Back to the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iacceptcookies.com/general/6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iacceptcookies.com/general/6</link>
	<description>James Larkin's rambling blog without the rambling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.iacceptcookies.com/general/6/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iacceptcookies.com/general/6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>That&#039;d be good :) but not critical ... getting sub 100ms responses is good for me. The majority of my traffic will be Irish and not necessarily from my ISP 

That said ... the more Irish ISP&#039;s ye peer with the better it&#039;ll be :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;d be good <img src='http://www.iacceptcookies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but not critical &#8230; getting sub 100ms responses is good for me. The majority of my traffic will be Irish and not necessarily from my ISP </p>
<p>That said &#8230; the more Irish ISP&#8217;s ye peer with the better it&#8217;ll be <img src='http://www.iacceptcookies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.iacceptcookies.com/general/6/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iacceptcookies.com/general/6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>James

Hopefully we&#039;ll be peering with your ISP at some point which would give you better pings than what you are currently getting.

For example, my magnet DSL at home gives me:
PING iacceptcookies.com (81.17.252.110) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ragnell.blacknight.ie (81.17.252.110): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from ragnell.blacknight.ie (81.17.252.110): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=24.1 ms
64 bytes from ragnell.blacknight.ie (81.17.252.110): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=23.3 ms

As our network peers with Magnet&#039;s over INEX (http://www.inex.ie)

Regards

Michele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James</p>
<p>Hopefully we&#8217;ll be peering with your ISP at some point which would give you better pings than what you are currently getting.</p>
<p>For example, my magnet DSL at home gives me:<br />
PING iacceptcookies.com (81.17.252.110) 56(84) bytes of data.<br />
64 bytes from ragnell.blacknight.ie (81.17.252.110): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=23.1 ms<br />
64 bytes from ragnell.blacknight.ie (81.17.252.110): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=24.1 ms<br />
64 bytes from ragnell.blacknight.ie (81.17.252.110): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=23.3 ms</p>
<p>As our network peers with Magnet&#8217;s over INEX (<a href="http://www.inex.ie" rel="nofollow">http://www.inex.ie</a>)</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Michele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.388 seconds -->
